Newbie Question - Why do non-leveraged returns matter?

So say I have two portfolios, one with a 15% return and okay beta and one with a 3% return but INSANELY low beta (say the risk free rate). Surely I will almost always be better as a personal investor pumping shit loads of cash into the latter with TONS of leverage (I know more isn't always better, but just a decent amount), considering as the risk is so minimal (even with leverage).

Same with index funds - surely the risk of the S&P500 tanking enough for leverage to truly fuck you is so low (and even then, if it tanks that much everyone is fucked) that its worth just putting a decent amount of cash and optimised leverage in?


As a bonus question, how do personal investors actually work with long-term leverage? Say I have 100k, and want to lever 2x (so 200k I think? Not entirely familiar with terminology) in an index fund, will anyone actually offer that amount of money over like a 5 year time span? Is it even worth it with the interest payments?


Apologies if this is dumb / misinformed, just curious.

 

Hey man, this is actually a really good question. I've actually thought of this myself (why don't I leverage myself tits up into an S&P index for years on end) but I couldn't think of an answer. I highly suggest you move this to the HF forum cuz you'll get better answers there. What I can say is that the simplifying assumptions obviously won't hold (e.g., beta doesn't encompass more risk, you justify a higher expected return by taking on the commensurate risk, you could totally combine the portfolios etc), but that's BS and isn't answering the main question that's obvious.

Got me thinking lmao

Edit: I've crowdsourced this question with my network and I've only gotten average answers lmfao

 
Most Helpful

“Surely the risk of the S&P 500 tanking enough for leverage to truly fuck you is so low” is a view that has resulted in a very expensive lesson for a lot of people. Let’s take the 100K portfolio levered to 200k (so 100k margin loan or 1x leverage) and the past year as an example. Peak to trough from Dec 2021 to October 2022 the S&P dropped ~25% (Your 200k portfolio dropped to 150k). Doesn’t seem too bad, though here’s the problem - you still owe that 100k margin loan, which means your real equity went from 100k down to 50 (50% drop). On top of this, you’re paying 10% annual interest on this margin loan, so with interest you’ve now gone from a $100k investment to $40k (60% decline) on just a 25% drop in the market. You are also going to get margin called and either have to sell shares or put more cash into your account to avoid forced liquidation, so you can’t just sit on that $150k portfolio (which is now 2x levered on your $50k real equity) and wait for it to go back up. Reason being if that 150k equity value now drops to 100k, your initial 100k investment is now 100% wiped out and the entire value of the portfolio is the 100k margin loan you still owe - your broker is going to take steps to avoid this liability on their end well before you get to that point which makes your ability to weather downturns with leverage significantly more challenging.

 

ahhh that makes sense. I'm guessing truly risk free investments (e.g. bonds) don't yield enough to pay off interest.

How about if you dollar cost average with leverage? i.e. you add £100 every month and lever 2x on that investment. Old borrows get paid off (even at a loss), but in the long term, it's expected you can ride the increase. Again, apologies if dumb lol. I suspect broker won't lend that often?

 

Qui reprehenderit error repellat aperiam quia. Voluptates quod quibusdam quidem quibusdam saepe nobis sapiente. Voluptas voluptatem non aspernatur commodi. Et id aut sint reprehenderit dolore. Nihil temporibus vitae et veritatis.

Maxime et quas fugit inventore sapiente totam facilis incidunt. Tenetur dolor dolor dolor est ipsa repudiandae aut. Blanditiis quas sequi alias nemo provident nesciunt voluptas. Deserunt accusantium accusantium magnam.

Beatae quo quisquam et omnis est. Sed quisquam voluptates et et tempora autem. Totam earum quidem et cum autem dicta.

Fugit aut at qui voluptatum magni est. Sit laborum qui est est neque sunt.

 

Magni repudiandae id dolorem est. Repellat dolore voluptas qui autem rerum nulla saepe. Id deserunt at molestiae neque. Asperiores illo neque neque sed labore.

Alias vero veniam debitis sed. Minus ea maiores optio qui. Omnis libero repudiandae blanditiis vel voluptatem dicta ut.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 25 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”