IB Analyst at MM versus VC Associate at Small Fund

I recently graduated from a target and did off cycle recruiting in a bunch of different industries. I am deciding between an Associate role at a small VC firm and IB Analyst position. VC fund has 50M AUM and offered carry; they invest 1-3 M in seed rounds of B2B companies.

What factors are relevant? How limiting would VC be relative to IB for future career opps?

 

I'd do IB. Can always go VC later. VC is a lot about relationships and less about hard skills. The successful VC firms are successful for two reasons: they are pretty good at figuring out what is more likely than not to be a success, and most importantly, they are able to invest in the companies that everyone is eager to get in on. Most VC companies can't invest in the more or less slam dunk opportunities because they don't have the reputation needed to compete. This dynamic means there are a lot fewer hard skills and a lot more soft skills. It is all about knowing people and sourcing deals (which you won't be doing as an associate, usually). 

 

Assumenda voluptatem soluta quia maiores. Voluptatibus eius aspernatur alias eveniet delectus est quasi quia. Ad molestiae aut dignissimos soluta voluptates eos ratione aliquam.

Quis atque accusantium omnis quam quibusdam. Alias a quo earum.

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101

Leaderboard