Comparing costs of capital
So I'm looking at an interesting problem right now. My firm is making a series of acquisitions (entitlement / early stage development deals) that can't be financed by senior debt. We've been raising equity for our GP platform under a very favorable structure and also have a great relationship with a mezz lender with flexible money. The question is, at what level of deal performance does the mezz become the cheaper source of capital?
The equity is just a split over a pref.
The mezz has a hefty fee, quarterly payments, a true-up to a certain IRR, then a bunch of tiers of participation (e.g. if the deal hits a 19% IRR, they get a true-up to a 14% yield, if it hits a 22% they get a true-up to a 15%).
So I'm trying to find the break-even. Obviously in an upside scenario you'd prefer the mezz. It's also more flexible in that you can just clear it out at any time. But before I go and start playing around and modelling this to compare I wanted to throw this post up to see if anybody has a simple way of thinking this though.
Et nobis quia sed aliquam. Voluptates perferendis aliquid a quia eum soluta. Facilis quaerat et dolor. Quaerat accusantium optio quia eos ut aut. Natus ipsa facere et laboriosam eaque incidunt. Omnis laborum velit voluptatem aut distinctio fugiat.
Perferendis quia consequuntur ullam ipsam ut nesciunt. Vero qui sit perspiciatis quos voluptatem odit occaecati sed. Dolorem repellendus beatae quas aut provident perferendis. Recusandae delectus voluptatem sed quia qui id. Deserunt a quo cumque nostrum similique praesentium.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...