Top Growth (Insight/GA) vs MF Tech PE out of UG
Thoughts on these options. Is upstream mobility to buyout / HF (or a thoma bravo etc) that tough from growth? Thoughts on these two choices for movement into sequoia / khosla esque VC?
Thoughts on these options. Is upstream mobility to buyout / HF (or a thoma bravo etc) that tough from growth? Thoughts on these two choices for movement into sequoia / khosla esque VC?
+94 | Sr Asso / VP Unemployment Check-in | 58 | 5s | |
+35 | What did you do after signing? | 12 | 14h | |
+25 | Resume Gap after 2.5 Years in PE | 5 | 2d | |
+23 | PE Recruiting From IB- Play It Safe Or Reach For Best Fund Possible? | 11 | 1h | |
+21 | Public company LBO | 7 | 2d | |
+20 | Vista Lateral Associate | 12 | 4d | |
+19 | PE / IB in NYC from Cambridge compared to US colleges | 9 | 3h | |
+18 | VP HF Lateral to PE | 1 | 2d | |
+16 | How Technical Are You / Most People Really? | 3 | 3d | |
+16 | IB/PE Lifers, Was It Worth It? | 5 | 4d |
Career Resources
Can only speak on Growth Equity Analysts but they are virtually just sourcing they don't touch the model and are oftentimes very distant from the other members of the firms. Speaking towards Insight/GA.
I’d think when a deal is live, or at least towards the later stages of analyst and start of associate you’d get more hands on with the model (obviously stage dependent)
I would beg to differ. I’ve heard of accounts of people (at insight) who interacted with a grand total of one model up into their time as an associate. Kinda crazy.
Bump, I am an incoming SA at a top growth firm (Insight/Summit/GA). Would appreciate insight into this. I am super interested in growth and just curious as to future avenues
Insight out of undergrad is a 100% sourcing job. No chance of buyout or HF roles from that
.
When you join a heavily sourcing-oriented program you generally tend to exit to earlier stage or equivalent, rather than go later.
You only get model reps as an analyst/associate when a deal you source gets far enough to build one, which in this macro is not as often vs 2020/2021. Even then, growth-stage SaaS models are far lighter than the 3 statement model you'd pull together for larger buyout deals.
That’s up my alley fortunately
I'd just consider the certainty with which you'd like to stay in growth. These heavy-sourcing roles provide a different skillset than a BX/KKR/Silver Lake analyst gig, precisely because the modeling (if there is any) is not only so rare for analysts, but also because where it exists its quite simple for earlier stake software companies.
You'll have no trouble moving from a place like Insight to a top VC or even a really solid growth shop. But it is essentially impossible to get a MF buyout or UMM buyout gig unless you're joining one of their growth teams after. MM or LMM PE may be more possible, but you'd have to prove you can do the technical reps to headhunters if you want any looks in their processes.
Growth and venture are fun worlds to be in that are facing a tough period right now and for the immediate future. Consider whether you want to be developing a social skillset in sourcing versus getting much more heavy technical reps. Both sets of offers are exceptional, they just offer quite different experiences.
Quasi a est fuga libero qui corrupti. Omnis vel reiciendis natus nihil ut voluptatem doloribus dolorum.
Accusantium in ut voluptatibus est possimus sint. Eius asperiores ipsa ea. Illum amet et quo fuga qui quia. In quae iusto qui occaecati. Dignissimos tempora illo qui nam et qui nam. Distinctio maxime qui beatae tempora.
Eligendi repellendus tempora inventore sunt. Non odio cumque in. Repellat dolore vel quaerat ut id iure. Et repudiandae voluptate odit et laudantium minima quia ullam. Iste tempora saepe inventore sapiente consequatur sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...