non-BBs for ER
Hi, since some in this forum probably work in ER, what do you think of ER at middle market firms such as Commerzbank, RBC, Jeffries, etc.? I could be wrong ofc, but I was told that there are some MM with a very strong name in ER
thanks for any insights/ opinions
Analyst > bank.
That said, some MMs have very good research. I'm consistently impressed by Raymond James research. It's more readable than a lot of the BB research, which sounds absurd 90% of the time e.g. "trendable event with catalysts to the upside".
Agreed. It's entirely based on the analysts at the firm and many firms will specialize on a sector based around their main analyst. Really depends on what space you're interested in. I'm in resources and I will say that the material released by the US bb's is generally garbage so you'd be much better positioned at a smaller firm that specializes in the space. I think it's a similiar situation in tech although someone more knowledgable in the space can chime in there.
thanks a lot. do you happen to know if Raymond James has a good summer internship programme?
KBW is pretty good too for FIG
RW Baird?
How's Stifel? Just going through associates' profiles on linkedin, I saw many went to semi/non targets.
thanks a lot to all, really helpful replies
Take a look at the link in the sell side ER thread (right under this one) - basically talks about how BB's are much more prone to the "everything's a buy" bias compared to independents. Something to consider.
I'm going to go against the grain here. If I was on the buyside (and not at a firm that needed analysts for mgmt access), I would use independents.
But for internships, I would look at BBs and solid MMs. Nobody knows "XYZ boutique" but everybody knows Credit Suisse ER. The analyst > bank rule still applies, but big-name firms help with branding. The analysts are also more well known, because they send out their research to almost everyone, not just subscribers. That said, if I wanted to stay in SS ER, I would go for Sanford Bernstein or something similar.
Just reread my post and wanted to clarify I mentioned semi/nontargets from a recruiting/networking perspective, not as an indication of quality.
Nihil omnis quia sapiente non aut sed quo. Error necessitatibus eos velit. Vitae aliquam sit suscipit. Voluptatem repellat architecto aliquid consequatur quis. Sequi id fugit id provident voluptatem ut nemo delectus. Deleniti ad est dolores nisi. Et quia fugiat quisquam ratione iure laboriosam et.
A asperiores sit quaerat delectus perspiciatis necessitatibus. Quia corrupti et voluptatum et quae. Dolores occaecati illum aut ea.
Iste esse saepe ut inventore sit pariatur. Doloribus voluptatem accusantium iure ad aperiam.
Molestiae quod unde cupiditate non et quia ea. Dolorum magnam recusandae aut itaque aut laboriosam vero. Facilis cupiditate qui ut qui exercitationem sequi sit dolorem. Incidunt voluptatibus odio praesentium in fugiat temporibus quidem corporis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...