Sep 25, 2022

How do top credit shops compare to MM/LMM buyout?

If you had to choose between a top well-known credit shop (Ares/Oaktree/Golub) vs a no-name MM/LMM PE firm, which one would you choose? Currently going through a recruiting process and have options to go for both. Leaning towards credit due to brand value but trying to be aware of whether I'm going to pidgeon-hole myself into credit for the rest of my career. Are exit opps going to look vastly different?

 

What does the comp differential typically look like at top private credit shops vs MM/LMM buyout shops?

 

These are different jobs. If you want to end up in the credit investing world, take the Credit job while if you want to be in equity investing take the buyout job. It is way harder to move from credit to equity than from one fund to another pursuing similar strategies.

 

The answer on here will lean towards buyout PE - it's more "prestigious" and you're doing your own deals. That said, I have friends in MF credit who make really solid comp and their hours are better than even MM/LMM PE.

It's not going to be easy to do credit -> MF buyout PE, so don't go into credit thinking you'll have tons of vanilla PE opportunities. That said, not like a no-name firm will open endless doors for you either. 

If you're open to credit long-term I'd lean that direction solely based on friends experiences, if buyout is 100% your focus take that offer

 

I don't think this is very accurate in terms of exit opps. I personally know two guys who went from MF Credit (Bain Cap) to Apollo. You can find them easily by LinkedIn filtering.

 

There is one such person at Apollo, at least in the US. Other Bain Cap Credit exits are much different. Look at the norm, not the outlier.

 

At first when I tried on cycle as an An1, I was just taking interviews not knowing what I wanted to do or where I wanted to do it. One of the interviews was for Private Credit at a MF, and while I didn’t get the offer (my model was a dumpster fire tbh), it made me realize I find credit interesting.

Now, why I’m recruiting for it is because, in general, it has better work/life balance than Private Equity for similar pay. One fund I’m interviewing with said in my first round a comp range of $225-275 is fine.

Recruiting is going fine. Private Credit is exploding, so there’s plenty of opportunities — let’s ignore market overcrowding for now :). As a Private Equity Associate you’ll get looks from a lot of places. Still in the early innings of recruiting, but I’ve been targeting from UMM to MF (e.g., AEA to Blackstone) in their Direct Lending Groups (vs. Special Sits or Opportunistic).

Something flashier would probably keep more doors open and make my resume sparkle more, but after a few years in finance I don’t really care about doing anything cool. If I can make nearly $300K at 25 slinging 1L paper with fine WLB, I’m fine with that.

 

Interesting, all makes sense and thanks for sharing. Can certainly see why seeking a transaction oriented role in addition to better W/L balance while not sacrificing comp, would lead you to direct lending. To your point, special situations while intellectually stimulating and offering creativity and flexibility in structuring can be interesting, the lifestyle is worse than your traditional direct lending fund and is likely more akin to PE. Best of luck!

 
Most Helpful

Thank you, and of course. Happy to help. 

I’ll also add — reasons to use in an interview (you can decide how true they are):

  1.  learning from reps: you learn the most actually doing and executing transactions. each rep you’re learning new things or deepening what you do know. In PE your might only go post LOI a few times and you might never close a deal. In credit the velocity is a lot higher so there’s more chances to get reps 
  2. investment philosophy: credit is appealing because it matches your investment philosophy. the returns in credit are lower in an absolute basis but they’re also much less risky. creditors have legal recourse to protect their capital. you are making sure your downside is protected instead of swinging for the fences
  3. arms length relationship w/ portcos: a lot of PE is managing various things at a company (e.g., building a management incentive program, figuring out what to do with the VP of Ops equity (he’s been a good employee for 20 years but the business has outgrown him), our insurance carrier is denying our enormous claim, etc.). if you prefer focusing on transactions vs. getting in the nitty gritty at companies, private credit could he a better fit
  4. flexibility: many PE funds because of their mandate are going to be more limited in what they can do with structure (e.g., can only take majority positions, can’t go above preferred equity in the cap stack, deals have to be structured equity, whatever) and if the equity thesis isn’t strong enough you're not doing the deal. with credit there are, generally, lot more options → you can move down the cap stack, you can put tighter covenants, you can use warrants or convertible debt, and if it comes to it you can take them to court. also, there’s a nice band of “will give the sponsor a 1.1x times return but will be able to service their debt.” it’s a lot safer diligencing potential downside vs. praying for a rocket ship. 
 

Depth of diligence is quite deep — as in 2 hour calls listening to Marsh pepper management about their Insurance. Pre-IOI, Associates often lead diligence at my fund. Post IOI/LOI you have a large part still. You’re running the model and various analyses (e.g., funds flow, waterfalls, churn, customer retention, LTV/CAC, ROAS, etc.), you’re managing 3rd party providers, support on transaction/financing documentation and taking the pen on the IC memo.

Workstreams are rather broad (particularly given we’re underpaid, but that’s not the point). We’re responsible for 1) deal execution, 2) sector work (I cover 6 sub-sectors) which can involve market mapping, general research, update presentations, outreach to potential targets or intermediaries, 3) administrative work (e.g., deal flow reporting), 4) internal whatever (e.g., we need an analyses to see what happens to our portcos if interest rates stay high through 2023, etc.), 5) origination: we all cover different banks and lenders and are responsible for maintaining the relationship with them, and 6) portfolio management (e.g., we just for managements 2023 budget we need to stress test it and give feedback, basically running CorpDev w/ your VP, etc.)

For what I can ascertain as someone who hasn’t worked in private credit, it seems like the the responsibilities are, by and large, similar. However, when it comes to transaction execution and portfolio management (two of the biggest time sucks), it doesn’t go nearly as deep when you’re investing in credit vs. equity (in general).

 

Dolorum in aliquam nulla consequuntur magnam non omnis. Ipsa laborum tempore et esse omnis voluptatem. Et quas quasi consequatur reiciendis harum placeat consequatur.

Deleniti dolorem quis cumque rerum possimus non. Qui voluptatem aliquid aspernatur harum autem voluptatem nesciunt. Est est facilis vero laboriosam vitae repudiandae dolorem.

Eum ratione et eveniet suscipit et corrupti. Et ut ut ex ullam placeat quod. Totam tempore a error sunt. Ut incidunt rerum enim voluptas dolor optio.

 

Esse velit animi provident molestias. Voluptatum architecto ut quibusdam ut exercitationem quasi. Perspiciatis rerum magni ducimus sit dolorem reprehenderit aut.

Excepturi dignissimos dolores quos hic voluptates esse. Cupiditate ullam voluptas nostrum. Repellat temporibus ipsam accusantium. Perspiciatis molestiae quibusdam exercitationem fuga accusantium. Tempore dolor dolore ipsam aut vel ut. Hic harum magnam ut ipsam rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 25 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”