Boehner called Rush Limbaugh before sharing the GOP plan with his conference
(Neanderthal, 3,024
Points)
on 7/25/11 at 10:23pm
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/173311-boehner-briefed-...
Boehner apparently needs to get the ok from a fat drug addicted moron before sharing the GOP's plan with the Rs in the House.
Have we hit rock bottom?






Kinda like the Dems claiming
Kinda like the Dems claiming $1T based on the ending of the wars..haha what a joke. Both are just kicking the can down the road...
Its a bit childish to use
Its a bit childish to use that kind of language we all know you are a bleeding heart liberal. It is just stupid to spew crap like this when this is no different then what Obama does when he goes on CNN or MSNBC. He is going on media outlets that perdominately have similar viewpoints to what he has. Boehner just wanted to get his idea out and see how other conservative icons fell about it.
Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays
heister wrote: Its a bit
Its a bit childish to use that kind of language we all know you are a bleeding heart liberal. It is just stupid to spew crap like this when this is no different then what Obama does when he goes on CNN or MSNBC. He is going on media outlets that perdominately have similar viewpoints to what he has. Boehner just wanted to get his idea out and see how other conservative icons fell about it.
...are you retarded?
Financial Modeling Training
Guide to Finance Interviews
Banking Resume
TheKing wrote: heister
Its a bit childish to use that kind of language we all know you are a bleeding heart liberal. It is just stupid to spew crap like this when this is no different then what Obama does when he goes on CNN or MSNBC. He is going on media outlets that perdominately have similar viewpoints to what he has. Boehner just wanted to get his idea out and see how other conservative icons fell about it.
...are you retarded?
+1, terrible analogy. That would be like Obama calling Rachel Maddow for advice or permission. Rednecks would choke on their dipspit.
Wow, what a hilarious post.
Wow, what a hilarious post. Keep supporting your boy who thinks increasing taxes during a recession/slow recovery is a good idea. Glad to know you support robbing people just because you think you know better than they do.
You do not.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
Jose.Rey wrote: TheKing
Its a bit childish to use that kind of language we all know you are a bleeding heart liberal. It is just stupid to spew crap like this when this is no different then what Obama does when he goes on CNN or MSNBC. He is going on media outlets that perdominately have similar viewpoints to what he has. Boehner just wanted to get his idea out and see how other conservative icons fell about it.
...are you retarded?
+1, terrible analogy. That would be like Obama calling Rachel Maddow for advice or permission. Rednecks would choke on their dipspit.
How is that a terrible analogy? Who said he was asking permission? Its a well known fact that Obama will twist any idea into the kicking grandma on the curb and leaving sick people to be kicked out of hospitals when anyone suggests doing any kind of cutting to the big 3 expenses in the fed budget. So it was actually a very smart move by Boehner to get his points out before it gets twisted around.
Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays
I wouldn't call Rush Limbaugh
I wouldn't call Rush Limbaugh a conservative. Like Glenn Beck, he is basically a glorified morning-zoo entertainer who plays a conservative on the radio. Anybody who pimped for unconstitutional, illegal executive wars, in my book, is not a conservative.
Sad that Boehner has to kowtow to that ilk but the guy's got 20 million listeners.
Boehner completely dominated
Boehner completely dominated tonight. Obama does nothing but try and portray life as if the government is Robin Hood, protecting the helpless citizens from the evil rich and business men.
When Boehner said "not going to happen" I started cheering in the gym.
Republicans FINALLY have a ball sack and are willing to play hardball. Bravo.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
I think it's more of a feeler
I think it's more of a feeler type thing. If he called Rush and then immediately canceled it, that's different. But it may just be gauging the reaction to it. Hell, I would call people I respect if I was gonna present something that affected everyone. Washington DC is so liberal you probably can't get a good feel as to what the American people think.
Also, all Obama has to do is go outside and ask a random person in DC- they are all liberal. The people in the mainstream media are...ALL LIBERAL. When you're in a bubble of liberal-ness it's hard to see outside and se what America wants.
Reality hits you hard, bro...
ANT wrote: Boehner completely
Boehner completely dominated tonight. Obama does nothing but try and portray life as if the government is Robin Hood, protecting the helpless citizens from the evil rich and business men.
When Boehner said "not going to happen" I started cheering in the gym.
Republicans FINALLY have a ball sack and are willing to play hardball. Bravo.
Obama tried to play the populist card in and out of the negotiations but with the majority of the american people opposed to raising the debt ceiling, the GOP is in the catbird seat on this one. Frankly, Joe Sixpack does not give a shit about CAPM or the US treasurys complex so all this bullshit about supposed financial chaos from a default means nothing to him. He was fed the same line of bullshit during the 2008 plunder of the public treasury to cover the bets of BB prop desks. You can't fool all of the people all of the time.
heister is not retarded.
heister is not retarded. Retarded are the people like you and me who still read this and try to share the other viewpoints besides the obvious fascism that dominates this site. It's the equivalent of teaching algebra to a dog. No matter how you approach it, all he'll do is bark.
Fascism ahahhahahahaha 50% of
Fascism ahahhahahahaha
50% of the people pay nothings and receive benefits because the other 50% pay. Democrats are not happy with this and want to milk the people more. That sounds like fascism to me.
Sorry, cut spending. 1/3rd someones hard earned money is good enough. Lay off government workers, shut down government agencies, do more with less.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
I wanted to puke listening to
I wanted to puke listening to Obama. All he ever does is try and play the poor against the rich card. The poor pay nothing and get a lot. They might not be driving range rovers, but the richest nation has the richest poor. The economy is in a tough spot and we finally need to tackle the deficit. You do this by cutting spending. Once the economy comes back tax receipts will increase. This is not the time to milk the hard working Americans for additional taxes.
Beohner was short, sweet and to the point. Obama yammered on and on, same old political bullshit.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
Let's not pretend for one
Let's not pretend for one second that cutting government expenditures is somehow going to make our economy take off. It's just as recessionary as raising taxes, the cutting of which is the main reason we are at this point in the first place.
Quite frankly it's embarassing that you have politicians deferring to guys like Rush. Dude dropped out of Southeast Missouri State. He may control much of our country's public opinion, but anyone who takes him seriously should be ashamed of themselves. Same goes for Hannity (NYU dropout) or Beck (didn't go to college). It's not about being a prestige whore, it's about demanding that guys who are going to pontificate on everything under the sun have at least a modicum of academic credentials. Hannity ranting about Obama's "class warfare" as he targets the top 2% of the country is laughable.
Financial Modeling Training
Guide to Finance Interviews
It literally blows my mind
It literally blows my mind that people don't think 30% of your income is enough.
God asks for 10% tithing., Uncle Sam wants 3x that. Kiss my ass.
30% is still utter robbery. I think the top tax bracket should decrease to 25%.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
GoodBread wrote: Let's not
Let's not pretend for one second that cutting government expenditures is somehow going to make our economy take off. It's just as recessionary as raising taxes, the cutting of which is the main reason we are at this point in the first place.
Quite frankly it's embarassing that you have politicians deferring to guys like Rush. Dude dropped out of Southeast Missouri State. He may control much of our country's public opinion, but anyone who takes him seriously should be ashamed of themselves. Same goes for Hannity (NYU dropout) or Beck (didn't go to college). It's not about being a prestige whore, it's about demanding that guys who are going to pontificate on everything under the sun have at least a modicum of academic credentials. Hannity ranting about Obama's "class warfare" as he targets the top 2% of the country is laughable.
1) Beohner was not deferring to anyone. Rush is a well followed, conservative talk show host and Beohner was getting the message out. Nothing more, nothing less.
2) Who gives a shit if he dropped out? What does college education have to do with anything. Attitudes like that are why Democrats think they can control other people. Why they think they know better.
A college education gives you a narrow intelligence. You are not magically smart. People really need to pull their head out of their ass. It is comical how elitist some people think they are because they have a piece of paper on the wall.
And to think the Dems are tying to reach the middle class.
Democrats are the party of the rich who like to control and the poor who will live on their knees vs being free citizens.
Cutting government employees and spending will release a drag on this country. Every dollar I send to Washington to be wasted is a dollar I cannot invest or spend. If you think the government does anything but suck the life out of things you are horrible mistaken.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
It would be one things if
It would be one things if these guys were college dropouts and were smart. But they're not. They're career media personalities who couldn't hack it in school. It has nothing to do with me being elitist and all to do with me seeing dudes make up the most inane, idiotic and manipulative stuff I have ever heard.
ANT, you're so woefully beholden to your ideology, it's mesmerizing. The Republicans are as much to blame as the Democrats for this whole mess. I was worried about the deficit back in 2003 when we went into a massive war after cutting taxes and I bet a lot of the guys on this board magically became austerians after Obama's election. It's unreal how many pseudo-deficit hawks popped out of the woodwork in the last few years.
The Republican party hasn't been the party of the free in a long, long time. Most of today's House Republicans are as vile and corrupt as the people who nominated Barry Goldwater. The Democrats are spineless, pandering and just as useless as the guys across the aisle.
Washington is a joke. Corporations bought it long ago and they managed to trick nearly half the people into believing that they somehow shared their interests with a horribly deformed version of classical economics and pseudo-libertarianism.
Financial Modeling Training
Guide to Finance Interviews
Washington is a joke, I will
Washington is a joke, I will agree with you there, but only one party is making this a class war and trying to increase taxes.
I still do not understand how companies own Washington anymore than individuals. Obama spoke at La Raza the other day and was obviously pandering to them when it comes to immigration. NRA represents my opinions and beliefs and do a good job. I really don't see how companies dominate anything.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
I love how La Raza ate his
I love how La Raza ate his shit up even though he hasn't done jack on immigration like he said he would.
"So who lost the hundy?" -Tom Montag
"WSO is like the 300 for anti spamage. None shall pass." -happypantsmcgee
I don't know why the
I don't know why the president is even talking to La Raza. The US has no issue with Mexicans legally immigrating, just like everyone other country. The problem is La Raza is not an American organization, but an organization that supports allowing illegal immigration.
If a boat load of Italians illegally washed on shore I would be the first kicking them back home. But that is because I am an American and love my home nation. Unfortunately certain immigrant groups don't want to assimilate and luckily they have a President who is more than happy to keep allowing people to ILLEGALLY enter this country.
The mice will play when the cats away.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
Opps. Anyone that supports
Opps.
Anyone that supports legal immigration for everyone and is against illegally entering a country is a fascist pig.
Sorry. I support fairness and legality. I am horrible
:(
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
wow since when does the tea
wow since when does the tea party hang out on WSO? you guys fucking disgust me
TropicalFruit wrote: wow
wow since when does the tea party hang out on WSO? you guys fucking disgust me
Since when were vaginas allowed on WSO?
Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays
Wow, being against illegal
Wow, being against illegal immigration is wrong? I didn't realize that the USA was the only nation not allowed to have a border.
I suppose it is fair that everyone else in the world has to go through a formal process to immigrate, but because someone lives within close proximity that excludes them from what everyone else does.
Man, I didn't realize Mexico was superior to all other nations in the fact that they don't have to obey the rules that others follow.
Sorry pal, this is adult time, no 5 year old logic allowed.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
Asking 2% of Americans to pay
Asking 2% of Americans to pay more taxes is not "class warfare." We're one standard deviation away from the mean top tax rate since 1913, and the top 2% did just fine before the Bush tax cuts. I don't even care to have the tax rate raised. But there are plenty of loopholes to close, whether it be carried interest or the myriad ways corporations avoid paying taxes. I'm very much in favor or raising revenue without increasing rates. That many people find that unacceptable is a testament to the sway corporations hold on Washington and much of public opinion.
+1 to supporting legal immigration and being against illegal immigration though. There are demographic benefits to be reaped from immigration, all the more so if these people are to pay taxes and contribute to social security.
Financial Modeling Training
Guide to Finance Interviews
So because someone isn't
So because someone isn't going to miss it, 2% is cool?
If someone has 5 TV's is taking 1 ok?
Sorry, robbing someone because they wont miss the money doesn't fly in my world. The poor don't pay taxes. The poor get plenty of services. The rich and all the rest of us pay plenty. Enough is enough.
We have the highest corporate tax rate. I have 3 10-q's on my floor with companies paying 27-35% taxes.
We need to stop spending. The bleeding heart is killing us.
Glad you see my point on immigration. Too many people go insane when anyone questions peoples "right" to come to the US.
Their counter is always that illegals do the work Americans don't want to, cheaper than American's want.
1) Migrants do the work and they are documented workers which is fine
2) Saying that illegal immigration is good because we can use them as slave labor is disgusting ethics.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
That's where we differ. The
That's where we differ. The Tea Party and the American Revolution were about "No Taxation Without Representation," not the "No Taxation" cry we hear today. I have no beef with everyone paying taxes, but let's not pretend that higher rates for the top 2% won't do vastly more to reduce our deficit than higher rates for the bottom 20%. Spending cuts will disproportionately affect lower incomes, one could accuse the Republicans of engaging in just as much "class warfare" as the Democrats. The main reason we have such a large deficit is decreased tax revenues. Not attempting to raise these for ideological reasons is foolish.
As far the the corporate tax rates, loopholes need to be closes and the rate lowered to encourage corporations to pay it. The current system is basically asking corporations to avoid paying taxes.
Financial Modeling Training
Guide to Finance Interviews
heister wrote: TropicalFruit
wow since when does the tea party hang out on WSO? you guys fucking disgust me
Since when were vaginas allowed on WSO?
looks like we've got a badass here
We have taxation and it is
We have taxation and it is around 30%.
2% more might be small, but it is still wrong. We have decreased revenue because we are coming out of a recession/slow growth economy. Raising taxes for the top 2% will not do anything to fix the deficit. It will make people cheer as if the rich are doing something wrong.
Spending should be cut, flat out. It can scale back up when the deficit is reduce and/or tax revenue increases when the economy comes around. Being poor sucks, but the government is not a parent.
Increasing taxes on the rich simply because they have extra money is wrong. Why not just take all of their money or limit people to only $1MM. The government could just "tax" away their wealth and fix the deficit.
Same logic, just amplified for effect. Wrong is wrong, small or large.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
TropicalFruit wrote: heister
wow since when does the tea party hang out on WSO? you guys fucking disgust me
Since when were vaginas allowed on WSO?
looks like we've got a badass here
Looks like we have an irrational and uninformed poster here.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
ANT wrote: TropicalFruit
wow since when does the tea party hang out on WSO? you guys fucking disgust me
Since when were vaginas allowed on WSO?
looks like we've got a badass here
Looks like we have an irrational and uninformed poster here.
haha wow apparently I'm irrational and uninformed despite the fact that I have yet to even post an argument. go ahead and call me ignorant while you're at it.
GoodBread wrote: That's where
That's where we differ. The Tea Party and the American Revolution were about "No Taxation Without Representation," not the "No Taxation" cry we hear today. I have no beef with everyone paying taxes, but let's not pretend that higher rates for the top 2% won't do vastly more to reduce our deficit than higher rates for the bottom 20%. Spending cuts will disproportionately affect lower incomes, one could accuse the Republicans of engaging in just as much "class warfare" as the Democrats. The main reason we have such a large deficit is decreased tax revenues. Not attempting to raise these for ideological reasons is foolish.
As far the the corporate tax rates, loopholes need to be closes and the rate lowered to encourage corporations to pay it. The current system is basically asking corporations to avoid paying taxes.
Its both a revenue and expenditure problem. The incredible spending done by Obama over the past few years was astounding, however, we were in the middle of the biggest recession in 90 years, it was entirely justified and Republicans would have done the exact same thing. Anyone who thinks otherwise is kidding themselves.
The hysterical thing about the Tea Party is that the original Boston Tea Party was a protest against taxes levied on the colonies to subsidise the trading of the East India Company. In other words, they were protesting against tax subsidies for big business. When was the last time you saw an anti-corporate subsidy/tax breaks sign at a Tea Party rally? Pretty funny if you think about it....
Before we do anything, we
Before we do anything, we should really restructure the tax brackets.
If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
^^ fucking bracket creep is
^^
fucking bracket creep is what pisses me off the most. i'm making north of 6 figures but where i live that doesn't make me rich. far from it. though i'm being taxed at a higher rate than what the rockefellers were paying.
as one of the founders said, republics are finished when the government realizes it can bribe the public with its own money.
i don't give a shit whether it is the military industrial complex or the welfare complex looting my cash. i'd like to see them both shut down, but let's face it:
NEITHER PARTY ACTUALLY WANTS TO SHRINK GOVERNMENT, THEY JUST WANT TO REARRANGE IT TO ENABLE DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS OF THIEVES TO LOOT IT
I haven't seen an ANT rant in
I haven't seen an ANT rant in a while. I've missed them. WSO is too quiet without ANT stirring the pot once in a while.
This crisis has nothing to do with ideology. I think everyone can agree that Washington is broken.
Here is an excerpt from an article from The Atlantic, from former GOP congressman Mickey Edwards, regarding the division in Washington.
When Democrat Nancy Pelosi became speaker of the House, the leader of the lawmaking branch of government, she said her priority was to … elect more Democrats. After Republican victories in 2010, the Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said his goal was to … prevent the Democratic president’s reelection. With the country at war and the economy in recession, our government leaders’ first thoughts have been of party advantage.
This is in essence the problem with Washington today.
It is not concerned with governing.
It is not concerned with nation building.
It is not concerned with fighting wars.
It is not concerned with promoting good economic policy.
It is not concerned with passing laws with the public's best interest in mind.
It is not concerned with listening to the constituents.
It is not concerned with any particular ideology.
Washington is concerned with one and only one thing, and that is party advantage and power. That is it. Each party is concerned only with consolidating its own power, and cares not a wit about anything else. I'd bet that both parties could swap positions over night, and their GOALS would remain the same: elect more of their own. Not to push for a particular ideology or to protect American's best interests, but to bow to their party bosses wishes to continue to consolidate power.
It really is a shame too. These guys are playing a game of chicken with our credit rating. Perhaps its for the best though...
looking for that pick-me-up to power through an all-nighter?
GoodBread wrote: That's where
That's where we differ. The Tea Party and the American Revolution were about "No Taxation Without Representation," not the "No Taxation" cry we hear today. I have no beef with everyone paying taxes, but let's not pretend that higher rates for the top 2% won't do vastly more to reduce our deficit than higher rates for the bottom 20%. Spending cuts will disproportionately affect lower incomes, one could accuse the Republicans of engaging in just as much "class warfare" as the Democrats. The main reason we have such a large deficit is decreased tax revenues. Not attempting to raise these for ideological reasons is foolish.
As far the the corporate tax rates, loopholes need to be closes and the rate lowered to encourage corporations to pay it. The current system is basically asking corporations to avoid paying taxes.
Hold on. The tea Party isn't advocating no taxation. If anything a 30% tax bracket is definitely taxation. Everyone quotes "after 1913 this is within one standard deviation of the top tax bracket". But what was it before then? Yea...0%.
Reality hits you hard, bro...
ANT wrote: It literally blows
It literally blows my mind that people don't think 30% of your income is enough.
God asks for 10% tithing., Uncle Sam wants 3x that. Kiss my ass.
30% is still utter robbery. I think the top tax bracket should decrease to 25%.
Dude, my father pays 50% in London. Beat that..
FinancialNoviceII wrote: ANT
It literally blows my mind that people don't think 30% of your income is enough.
God asks for 10% tithing., Uncle Sam wants 3x that. Kiss my ass.
30% is still utter robbery. I think the top tax bracket should decrease to 25%.
Dude, my father pays 50% in London. Beat that..
Ever occur to you that you are getting ass fucked by the government. What ANT is trying to say is why should anyone have to pay 30% of their money when they only recieve about 7% of their wages in direct services, if you include indirect services such as national defense and security its like 11%. Where does the rest of the money go? The Constution clearly states that the governments sole responsibilities are to provide national infastructure and national defense. No where does it even hint at providing a nice living for poor people, health care for old people, retirement for old people, services for disabled people, ect ect. Im not saying that these are terrible things to provide, I am saying that these are a growth of government. Also the tax rates need to be cut to 0% and then the government needs to go broke so it can be changed. Washington has never had a revenue problem, if washington get $1 they have more then enough. To even suggest that this deficit is a revenue problem is a joke, if they didnt spend more then they took in it wouldnt be a problem now would it?
Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays
heister
It literally blows my mind that people don't think 30% of your income is enough.
God asks for 10% tithing., Uncle Sam wants 3x that. Kiss my ass.
30% is still utter robbery. I think the top tax bracket should decrease to 25%.
Dude, my father pays 50% in London. Beat that..
Ever occur to you that you are getting ass fucked by the government. What ANT is trying to say is why should anyone have to pay 30% of their money when they only recieve about 7% of their wages in direct services, if you include indirect services such as national defense and security its like 11%. Where does the rest of the money go? The Constution clearly states that the governments sole responsibilities are to provide national infastructure and national defense. No where does it even hint at providing a nice living for poor people, health care for old people, retirement for old people, services for disabled people, ect ect. Im not saying that these are terrible things to provide, I am saying that these are a growth of government. Also the tax rates need to be cut to 0% and then the government needs to go broke so it can be changed. Washington has never had a revenue problem, if washington get $1 they have more then enough. To even suggest that this deficit is a revenue problem is a joke, if they didnt spend more then they took in it wouldnt be a problem now would it?
You completely missed the point of my statement. Of course the government is screwing us, I was merely mentioning that ANT, in complaining about the 30%, ought to be aware of the situation in other countries too. No joke intended, I can't comment on the US deficit as I simply dont know enough. But common sense within me sees the same parallels occurring here in London, where in fact a larger tax rate and higher VAT as implemented in January has caused our economy to slow and I agree with ANT in saying more taxes are not the answer.
For the record for those
For the record for those unaware the 50% is levied on those earning £150k or more. Scandalous and certainly has affected the incoming foreign investment within the UK.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8604215.stm
FinancialNoviceII
It literally blows my mind that people don't think 30% of your income is enough.
God asks for 10% tithing., Uncle Sam wants 3x that. Kiss my ass.
30% is still utter robbery. I think the top tax bracket should decrease to 25%.
Dude, my father pays 50% in London. Beat that..
Ever occur to you that you are getting ass fucked by the government. What ANT is trying to say is why should anyone have to pay 30% of their money when they only recieve about 7% of their wages in direct services, if you include indirect services such as national defense and security its like 11%. Where does the rest of the money go? The Constution clearly states that the governments sole responsibilities are to provide national infastructure and national defense. No where does it even hint at providing a nice living for poor people, health care for old people, retirement for old people, services for disabled people, ect ect. Im not saying that these are terrible things to provide, I am saying that these are a growth of government. Also the tax rates need to be cut to 0% and then the government needs to go broke so it can be changed. Washington has never had a revenue problem, if washington get $1 they have more then enough. To even suggest that this deficit is a revenue problem is a joke, if they didnt spend more then they took in it wouldnt be a problem now would it?
You completely missed the point of my statement. Of course the government is screwing us, I was merely mentioning that ANT, in complaining about the 30%, ought to be aware of the situation in other countries too. No joke intended, I can't comment on the US deficit as I simply dont know enough. But common sense within me sees the same parallels occurring here in London, where in fact a larger tax rate and higher VAT as implemented in January has caused our economy to slow and I agree with ANT in saying more taxes are not the answer.
Really only the 1st sentence was in response to your statement. I should have presented that better by setting it seperate. Oh well.
Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays
For those ignorant (as I'm
For those ignorant (as I'm not aware of the tax situation in the US), is it simply one tax bracket that everyone falls under or is the system similar to the UK, where tax brackets are applied dependant on yearly earnings?
FinancialNoviceII wrote: For
For those ignorant (as I'm not aware of the tax situation in the US), is it simply one tax bracket that everyone falls under or is the system similar to the UK, where tax brackets are applied dependant on yearly earnings?
The rates rise as income goes up, however since those who pay in close to 17% and under get more back then what they pay in it essentially starts at those paying 22% and up being the actuall tax payers.
Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays
50% is mind boggling. I am
50% is mind boggling. I am all for paying taxes. I like the idea of government and collective money for the greater good. I just think anything more than 1/3 what you earn is horrible. I earned the money. I worked for it. I know how to spend it.
People are all for raising taxes on people under guise that they won't miss the money. That fails my ethical test. It also ignores the charity that most wealthy people partake in. The evil billionaires like Ted Turner, Bill Gates, etc who are giving their money away.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
I also think a third is
I also think a third is grossly under estimating how much we truly do pay in taxes. Everything is taxed. When you add it up normal earners probably pay closer to 40%.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
Saying "it's worse" in x
Saying "it's worse" in x country doesn't justify it in another. Hell, Robert Mugabe at one point hyper inflated the currency and became a dictator. That doesn't mean that QE10000 and a military state in America is just.
Reality hits you hard, bro...
happypantsmcgee wrote: Before
Before we do anything, we should really restructure the tax brackets.
\
Couldn't agree more!
Ant, how I've missed your
Ant, how I've missed your rants my friend.
TropicalFruit wrote: ANT
wow since when does the tea party hang out on WSO? you guys fucking disgust me
Since when were vaginas allowed on WSO?
looks like we've got a badass here
Looks like we have an irrational and uninformed poster here.
haha wow apparently I'm irrational and uninformed despite the fact that I have yet to even post an argument. go ahead and call me ignorant while you're at it.
ignorant
So, people are actually
So, people are actually defending calling Limbaugh first? It doesn't matter what side you're on, it's pathetic.
If Obama called Lawrence "I'm an Owl" O'Donnell before sharing his plan on the air last night, he'd be torn to shreds as a left wing media puppet.
How blind to ideology must one be to defend this sort of stupid shit? It has literally nothing to do with your position!
Financial Modeling Training
Guide to Finance Interviews
Banking Resume