I came across a blog with very specific notes on the class Peter Thiel is currently teaching at Stanford. I've been going through a class lecture a day when I get some down time in the office. Here are some takeaways I thought we're good from the first 3 lessons. (Some of these are little... Very detailed notes of Peter Thiel's startup class at Stanford |
<strong>Summary</strong> This is not a financial modeling course like the one that is offered at Wall Street Prep, Investment Banking Institute or Analyst Exchange. <strong>Mod Note</strong> Not WSO competing products. Rather this is a series of free tutorials that help... Free Model-Formatting Course |
Here's my story:
I will be graduating this semester from a non-target university, majoring finance and accounting, with a decent gpa (3.5 up). I started networking last summer, searching for that IBD full time offer. I was even considering delaying my graduation for one semester with the... Full Time Offer, at last! Thanks WSO! |
This site has really been an amazing help along my career path and I felt that it was necessary to try and give back to the community and hopefully give some hope to the fellow non targets out there that are trying to break in. I also wanted to thank everyone on this site who have been extremely... Non Target Success Story: MBB Summer Intern |
Fellow Primates,
We are looking for 1-2 students on each campus to help WSO in its sales efforts to student clubs/career centers, and overall promotion at your school both online and on the ground. Below is a description of the position and benefits...thanks in advance for your help! <a... WSO Campus Representative Program |
Just got back from a quick lunch break, first one i've had in 6 months not at the desk. I'm a 25yro quant trader/geek at a well known hedge fund in NYC and I pull in around $250k-$500k, all in, depending on the year. I was just at a bar downtown and this well known 23yro actress came in... Just got a famous actresses' number. Would a young trader have any chance with a hot rich actress? |
A common thread we see on WSO from time to time is regarding working for banks in their regional offices.
As banks are leaning towards more cost cutting and squeezing every dollar they can from their operations,<strong> a popular tactic has been to expand existing business and move... Consider your BB regional office. |
Really pretty girl. 22 yro. Just graduating out of Columbia. Majored in computer science. So, shes really smart too.
I'm a 25yro third year analyst at a BB.
Date went well. Dinner went really well. We laughing all the time and then I asked her what are the most important things she... Got back from a date. This is what she said. Is this a red flag? |
Broke the news to a few monkeys in the chat room, but I proposed to my long-time girlfriend yesterday and now we're engaged. Never been scared about much of anything in my life, and always had a good idea about how to approach new situations. A bit lost on this one. Anyone (other than... Just Got Engaged |
I'm going to be an organ donor in the next few months (kidney, to my dad). I'm not at all in it for the glory (except for subtly dropping it when i'm picking up a chick at the bar) BUT should I add this experience to my resume? If so, how and where?
If its subtle / small / at... Add "Organ Donor" to my resume? |
| User | Silver Bananas |
|---|---|
| TNA | 844 |
| CompBanker | 747 |
| Edmundo Braverman | 747 |
| happypantsmcgee | 645 |
| IlliniProgrammer | 547 |
| UFOinsider | 456 |
| Nouveau Richie | 374 |
| Midas Mulligan Magoo | 369 |
| TheKing | 341 |
| cphbravo96 | 338 |
| User | Banana Points |
|---|---|
| TNA | 11654 |
| Edmundo Braverman | 10971 |
| WallStreetOasis.com | 10232 |
| happypantsmcgee | 9263 |
| UFOinsider | 8063 |
| CompBanker | 7793 |
| IlliniProgrammer | 7625 |
| Midas Mulligan Magoo | 5250 |
| monty09 | 5168 |
| cphbravo96 | 4426 |
(e^(i*pi))/(-0.5)
(e^(i*pi))/(-0.5)
-MBP
288 but my conversion process
288 but my conversion process formulated from a vector application has it at 3.50
Amidoingitrite? U tell me. Umadbrah?
YourWorstEnemy wrote: 288 but
288 but my conversion process formulated from a vector application has it at 3.50
Amidoingitrite? U tell me. Umadbrah?
in.
2
2
This isn't funny or
This isn't funny or interesting. Why is it here?
One of those lights, slightly brighter than the rest, will be my wingtip passing over.
The way you wrote it, 288.
The way you wrote it, 288.
Is this a troll, or was this an interview question? I don't get this post to be honest.
manbearpig
(e^(i*pi))/(-0.5)
That's a pretty clever formulation, though, I like it.
One of those lights, slightly brighter than the rest, will be my wingtip passing over.
2x2Matrix wrote: This isn't
This isn't funny or interesting. Why is it here?
To see if you so called "wall street geniuses" have the brain power to solve a simple mathematics equation.
Who the fuck uses the fucking
Who the fuck uses the fucking "÷" symbol when writing terms?
I saw this on
I saw this on Bodybuilding.com this morning...
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=133389973
The mods closed it at page 84... a poll showed that 1500 (the slim majority) thought the answer is 2.
Bodybuiding forum no
Bodybuiding forum no wonder....actually didn't realize riods affected brain power...
The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee
WSO is not your personal search function.
Barcadia wrote: I saw this on
I saw this on Bodybuilding.com this morning...
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=133389973
The mods closed it at page 84... a poll showed that 1500 (the slim majority) thought the answer is 2.
What is going on in our schools? I think about the "Jaywalker" segment on Leno, but I dismiss those people as random idiots. But to actually get a majority out of a 3000+ sample size...words fail me.
I mean, yeah, those are bodybuilding forums, but I wouldn't expect anything that bad. Is this how all those ridiculous supplements are sold?
the answer is 288, though for
the answer is 288, though for some reason people are initially confused by how it is written and think the 2 is part of the brackets. coincidentally, i guarantee nobody would get it wrong if it was written like this:
48÷2*(9+3)
Silly hoes need to brush up
Silly hoes need to brush up on order of operations.
no one writes divide sign
no one writes divide sign like that, why not do
48/2*12 = 288
or you mean 48/ (2*12) = 2
^Yeah, it's 2.
^Yeah, it's 2.
I win here, I win there...
I hope both of you are
I hope both of you are joking...
The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee
WSO is not your personal search function.
PEMDAS it's 2
PEMDAS it's 2
LOL AT ALL THE PEOPLE SAYING
LOL AT ALL THE PEOPLE SAYING 288. how the fuck do yo not know simeple order of operations. its clearly 2...
"Look, you're my best friend, so don't take this the wrong way. In twenty years, if you're still livin' here, comin' over to my house to watch the Patriots games, still workin' construction, I'll fuckin' kill you. That's not a threat, that's a fact.
Please excuse my dear aunt
Please excuse my dear aunt sally
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations
Order of operations is easy
Order of operations is easy to forget I suppose
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
I cant believe some of you
I cant believe some of you think that is 288....
Will Hunting wrote: LOL AT
LOL AT ALL THE PEOPLE SAYING 288. how the fuck do yo not know simeple order of operations. its clearly 2...
Please change your name. You are retarded.
Everyone who is a dumbass just got monkey shit thrown at them.
FutureBanker09 wrote: PEMDAS
PEMDAS it's 2
ummm.... parentheses exponents multiplication division addition subtraction... with this how did you get 2?
also read my avatar icon.... It talks about your math skills
The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee
WSO is not your personal search function.
288. Obviously you do the
288.
Obviously you do the (3+9) first because it's in the parenthesis, giving you:
48÷2(12) which can be rewritten as 48÷2*12
Since ÷ and * are the same in order of operations, you go from left to right so 48÷2*12 = 24*12 = 288.
Money Never Sleeps? More like Money Never SUCKS amirite?!?!?!?
hahahahahah its
hahahahahah its 288....
PEMDAS isnt set in stone; multiplication doesn't always come before division, it depends on the order found in the problem
It is 2. The way it is
It is 2.
The way it is written is confusing, if it were written appropriately it would look like this:
48
--------- = 2
2(9+3)
Some of you guys might
Some of you guys might actually be retarded you realize that 2 *12 is a quantity you cant divide the two then multiply by 12.
For all of you arguing 2
For all of you arguing 2 instead of 288 because of PEMDAS, keep in mind that PEMDAS implies that you perform the operations WITHIN the parenthesis before anything else. When you have something like 2(12) on the other hand, it is the equivalent of 2*12 and does not take priority over divisions or other multiplications.
Money Never Sleeps? More like Money Never SUCKS amirite?!?!?!?
When you have 2*12 that is a
When you have 2*12 that is a quantity you divide that entire thing into 48. Look 48/24 is the same thing as 48/12*2
black financier you might
black financier you might want to look at your own icon
I think the people who are
I think the people who are writing 2 are just kidding around. I don't think anybody here really believes its 2.
future-ib wrote: When you
When you have 2*12 that is a quantity you divide that entire thing into 48. Look 48/24 is the same thing as 48/12*2
48/24 = 48/(12*2) but NOT (48/12)*2.
Money Never Sleeps? More like Money Never SUCKS amirite?!?!?!?
seriously? 48÷2(9+3) is an
seriously?
48÷2(9+3) is an equivalent formulation to 48÷2x...
HINT: the answer is not 24x
shit like this makes me wish I were a trader...
absinthe wrote: Will Hunting
LOL AT ALL THE PEOPLE SAYING 288. how the fuck do yo not know simeple order of operations. its clearly 2...
Please change your name. You are retarded.
Everyone who is a dumbass just got monkey shit thrown at them.
lol - owned.
future-ib wrote: black
black financier you might want to look at your own icon
You think the answer is 2 you are an idiot and your math is turrible. 288. learn basic 3rd grade math. well maybe 4th.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=48÷2(9%2B3)&t=macw01
The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee
WSO is not your personal search function.
dmackorth wrote: It is 2. The
It is 2.
The way it is written is confusing, if it were written appropriately it would look like this:
48
--------- = 2
2(9+3)
Lmao you can't just change the way its written because you don't agree with it.
The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee
WSO is not your personal search function.
From a children's math
From a children's math website: http://www.mathgoodies.com/lessons/vol7/order_operations.html
Rule 1: First perform any calculations **INSIDE** parentheses.
Rule 2: Next perform all multiplications and divisions, working from left to right.
Rule 3: Lastly, perform all additions and subtractions, working from left to right.
Solidarity, you bring up a good point, but I'm sticking to my guns here. While 48÷2x is not 24x, 48÷2(x) is a little more ambiguous since you could argue that it is the equivalent of 48÷2*x.
Money Never Sleeps? More like Money Never SUCKS amirite?!?!?!?
Solidarity wrote: seriously?
seriously?
48÷2(9+3) is an equivalent formulation to 48÷2x...
HINT: the answer is not 24x
shit like this makes me wish I were a trader...
You're not a trader for a reason.
The answer is 288. The order
The answer is 288. The order of operation reads right to left for MD and AS - one does not have priority over the other.
Solidarity wrote: seriously?
seriously?
48÷2(9+3) is an equivalent formulation to 48÷2x...
HINT: the answer is not 24x
shit like this makes me wish I were a trader...
48/2(9+3) not 48/(2(9+3))
The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee
WSO is not your personal search function.
I love the controversy this
I love the controversy this is igniting. Great post OP.
Money Never Sleeps? More like Money Never SUCKS amirite?!?!?!?
^ Haha, yeah seriously...
^ Haha, yeah seriously...
This really shouldn't need to be typed out and explained, but it seems some people here need to be schooled.
PEMDAS or BEDMAS where division and multiplication share the same order (whichever comes first) and similarly addition and subtraction share the same order (last) pending on whichever comes first in the equation.
48÷2(9+3)
Step 1: (9+3) = 12 (bracket)
Step 2: 48÷2 = 24 Division comes before multiplication because it's shown earlier in the equation
Step 3: 24(12) = 288
Seriously, why the hell are we discussing grade school math here?
Order of operations. "Pemdas"
Order of operations. "Pemdas" my nukka.
And I'm not even back office, im acct - im not even IN the office........ throwback question to alg 2 & trig soph year of hs.
Its 288. Order of ops.
Its 288. Order of ops. Honestly this is just poorly written.
Confusion breeds contempt. Evidenced by this thread.
looking for that pick-me-up to power through an all-nighter?
lmfao. holy shit. can we all
lmfao. holy shit. can we all just agree that the question is written idiotically? no one would ever write it that way in the first place.
-MBP
/end thread, it's
/end thread, it's 288
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=48%C3%B72%289%2B3%29
Good trolling though!
Kanon wrote: absinthe
LOL AT ALL THE PEOPLE SAYING 288. how the fuck do yo not know simeple order of operations. its clearly 2...
Please change your name. You are retarded.
Everyone who is a dumbass just got monkey shit thrown at them.
lol - owned.
Please change your name to Chuckie Sullivan. It's more fitting.
I'm going to use this as an interview question. When an engineer gets it wrong, I'm going to laugh his ass out the door.
Agree with the people saying
Agree with the people saying this is written ambiguously. If you are going to put the divide symbol between the 48 and the 2 you should toput the multiplcation symbol between the 2 and the (
Just so those of you who
Just so those of you who think its 2 don't feel dumb its being argued all over the internet right now.... comical.
The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee
WSO is not your personal search function.